<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 30 May 2012 23:21:45 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>The Tax Law Channel featuring The Tax Layer, Attorney Robert W. Wood</title><subtitle>Robert Wood Commentary</subtitle><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/atom.xml"/><updated>2012-05-28T00:27:44Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Tax Lawyer Robert Wood: Three Worst IRS Tax Traps</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/27/tax-lawyer-robert-wood-three-worst-irs-tax-traps.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/27/tax-lawyer-robert-wood-three-worst-irs-tax-traps.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-05-28T00:21:42Z</published><updated>2012-05-28T00:21:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste"><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/42013643" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>

</div>
<div></div>
<div>"Opinions about tax traps vary widely, but I consider these the worst parts of the tax code:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Personal Injury Exclusion, Attorney Fees Pay AMT, Foreign Accounts and FATCA."</div>
<div></div>
<p><a href="http://www.woodllp.com"><strong>Wood LLP</strong></a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2012/04/17/three-worst-irs-tax-traps/">Read more at Forbes.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>HUGE Taxpayer Win: Supreme Court Tells IRS 3 Years To Audit Is PLENTY!</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/27/huge-taxpayer-win-supreme-court-tells-irs-3-years-to-audit-i.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/27/huge-taxpayer-win-supreme-court-tells-irs-3-years-to-audit-i.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-05-28T00:19:33Z</published><updated>2012-05-28T00:19:33Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/42007256" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>

</p>
<p><span>Even the IRS has limits. If you&rsquo;ve&nbsp;</span><strong><em>ever&nbsp;</em></strong><span>been audited by the IRS, you may think going back&nbsp;</span><strong><em>three years</em></strong><span>&nbsp;is bad enough.&nbsp;The tax code generally allows the IRS to audit three years back, and six in some cases.&nbsp;The U.S. Supreme Court in</span><em><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-139.pdf" target="_blank"><span>U.S. v. Home Concrete &amp; Supply, LLC</span></a></em><span>&nbsp;has dramatically cut back on IRS reaches into&nbsp;six year territory. It&rsquo;s a positively stunning result.</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2012/04/25/huge-taxpayer-win-supreme-court-tells-irs-3-years-to-audit-is-plenty/"><strong>Read more at Forbes.com</strong></a></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.woodllp.com"><strong>Wood LLP</strong></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Why Americans want a Buffett Tax Robert Wood San Francisco California</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/why-americans-want-a-buffett-tax-robert-wood-san-francisco-c-1.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/why-americans-want-a-buffett-tax-robert-wood-san-francisco-c-1.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-05-04T20:50:52Z</published><updated>2012-05-04T20:50:52Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/40751089?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/40751089">Why Americans want a Buffett Tax Robert Wood San Francisco California</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user771377">Sequence Media</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Forget travel if you owe the IRS!</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/forget-travel-if-you-owe-the-irs.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/forget-travel-if-you-owe-the-irs.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-05-04T20:45:54Z</published><updated>2012-05-04T20:45:54Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/40746342?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/40746342">Forget travel if you owe the IRS Tax Lawyer Robert Wood</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user771377">Sequence Media</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">A tax law quietly proposed a few months ago&mdash;Owe IRS Taxes, Lose Your Passport&mdash;is quietly gaining momentum. Now more people have noticed. If you owe the IRS? You&rsquo;renot going anywhere if this law passes. In America, we love to tinker with our tax laws. Congress is always introducing one bill or another to tweak an already bloated and increasingly dysfunctional tax system.&nbsp;A tax law quietly proposed a few months ago&mdash;Owe IRS Taxes, Lose Your Passport&mdash;is quietly gaining momentum. Now more people have noticed. If you owe the IRS? You&rsquo;renot going anywhere if this law passes. In America, we love to tinker with our tax laws. Congress is always introducing one bill or another to tweak an already bloated and increasingly dysfunctional tax system.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Beware sharp increase in IRS audit rates Tax Lawyer Robert Wood San Francisco California</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/beware-sharp-increase-in-irs-audit-rates-tax-lawyer-robert-w.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/beware-sharp-increase-in-irs-audit-rates-tax-lawyer-robert-w.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-05-04T20:43:14Z</published><updated>2012-05-04T20:43:14Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/40742609?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/40742609">Beware sharp increase in  IRS audit rates Tax Lawyer Robert Wood San Francisco California</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user771377">Sequence Media</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">The IRS has released its 2011 IRS Data Book showing an unprecedented 62.8% spike in audit rates on the wealthiest taxpayers. These audits top out an all-time high of 30%. The IRS has long been criticized for putting too many resources into auditing taxpayers with comparatively simple issues and relatively few dollars at stake. High income persons not only have more dollars on the table but tend to have tougher and more nuanced tax issues. That can make audits more revenue productive.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Robert W. Wood, Wood LLP San Francisco California</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Can Failing to Issue 1099 Preclude Settlement Deduction?</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/can-failing-to-issue-1099-preclude-settlement-deduction.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/5/4/can-failing-to-issue-1099-preclude-settlement-deduction.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-05-04T20:39:51Z</published><updated>2012-05-04T20:39:51Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/39726054?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/39726054">Can Failing to Issue 1099 Preclude Settlement Deduction?</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user771377">Sequence Media</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.woodllp.com/Publications/Articles/pdf/Can_Failing.pdf" target="_blank">woodllp.com/Publications/Articles/pdf/Can_Failing.pdf</a><br /><span>It&rsquo;s no secret that information matching has become an increasingly important part of tax administration and enforcement. In many contexts, including the settlement of litigation, the need to determine whether Forms 1099 will be issued and if so, how and to whom, can loom large. San Francisco Tax Lawyer Robert Wood examines the commonly held view that a payer that fails to issue a Form 1099 can claim no deduction.</span></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Lawyer's "International Consulting" A Hobby, Says Tax Court</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/4/1/lawyers-international-consulting-a-hobby-says-tax-court.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/4/1/lawyers-international-consulting-a-hobby-says-tax-court.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-04-01T21:08:43Z</published><updated>2012-04-01T21:08:43Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste"><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/39081361?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="480" height="270" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></div>
<div>The Tax Lawyer Robert Wood talks about his article in Forbes titled "Lawyer's 'International Consulting' A Hobby, Says Tax Court."</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood LLP, in San Francisco. &nbsp;The author of more than 30 books, including Taxation of Damage Awards &amp; Settlement Payments (4th Ed. 2009 with 2012 Supplement, Tax Institute), he can be reached at Wood@WoodLLP.com. &nbsp;This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.</div>
<p>The Tax Lawyer Robert Wood talks about his article in Forbes titled "Lawyer's 'International Consulting' A Hobby, Says Tax Court."<br />Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood LLP, in San Francisco. &nbsp;The author of more than 30 books, including Taxation of Damage Awards &amp; Settlement Payments (4th Ed. 2009 with 2012 Supplement, Tax Institute), he can be reached at Wood@WoodLLP.com. &nbsp;This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Home mortgage interest deduction here to stay...at least for now</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/4/1/home-mortgage-interest-deduction-here-to-stayat-least-for-no.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/4/1/home-mortgage-interest-deduction-here-to-stayat-least-for-no.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-04-01T20:59:43Z</published><updated>2012-04-01T20:59:43Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste"><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/39299380?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="480" height="270" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></div>
<div>The Tax Lawyer, Robert Wood discusses his article in Forbes titled 'Home Mortgage Interest Deduction is Pure Poetry'</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood LLP, in San Francisco. &nbsp;The author of more than 30 books, including Taxation of Damage Awards &amp; Settlement Payments (4th Ed. 2009 with 2012 Supplement, Tax Institute), he can be reached at Wood@WoodLLP.com. &nbsp;This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Watch Your Mail For 1099s</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/3/16/watch-your-mail-for-1099s.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/3/16/watch-your-mail-for-1099s.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-03-16T22:18:01Z</published><updated>2012-03-16T22:18:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/38183488?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="480" height="270" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p>One tax item <em><strong>everyone </strong></em>pays attention to is the <a href="http://http//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw2_11.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Form W-2</span></a> they&rsquo;ll receive this year. It reports how much employees were paid in  2011 and how much tax was taken out.&nbsp; You must include a copy with your  tax return when you file.</p>
<p>But it&rsquo;s surprising how many people don&rsquo;t appreciate that Forms 1099 are <strong><em>equally </em></strong>important.  &nbsp;Maybe more. You don&rsquo;t file them with your return, but the IRS gets a  copy of every one.&nbsp; And IRS computers are whirring to match each dollar  with your Social Security Number.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s time for them to arrive, and you should keep a keen eye on every  one so your tax return is accurate. Every year the IRS sends millions  of tax notices based on matching 1099s asking for more money. Every  other notice or audit activity is tiny by comparison.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2012/01/20/watch-your-mail-for-1099s/"><em><strong>Read more at Forbes</strong></em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://http//www.forbes.com/2010/01/27/irs-1099-computer-matching-audits-personal-finance-robert-wood.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff; text-decoration: underline;">Ten Things You Should Know About 1099s</span></a><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><a href="http://http//www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2010/11/23/got-irs-forms-1099-more-soon/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff; text-decoration: underline;">Got IRS Forms 1099? More Soon</span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://http//www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2010/10/11/irs-form-1099-wars/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">IRS Form 1099 Wars</span> </span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://http//www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2010/09/30/im-sending-an-irs-1099-1099-are-you-outta-your-mind/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">I&rsquo;m Sending An IRS 1099: 1099 Are You Outta Your Mind?</span></span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://http//www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2010/10/27/adjust-recordkeeping-before-form-1099-onslaught/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff; text-decoration: underline;">Adjust Recordkeeping Before Form 1099 Onslaught</span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://http//www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2010/10/22/let-there-be-forms-1099/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff; text-decoration: underline;">Let There Be Forms 1099</span></a><span style="color: #3366ff;"> </span></p>
<p><em>Robert W. Wood practices law with <a href="http://www.woodllp.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Wood LLP</span></a>,  in San Francisco.&nbsp; The author of more than 30 books, including Taxation  of Damage Awards &amp; Settlement Payments (4th Ed. 2009 with 2012  Supplement, <a href="http://www.taxinstitute.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Tax Institute</span></a>), he can be reached at <a href="mailto:Wood@WoodLLP.com" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Wood@WoodLLP.com</span></a>.&nbsp;  This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be  relied&nbsp;upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified  professional.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Top Tax Tips From Zuckerberg's Facebook Bonanza</title><id>http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/3/16/top-tax-tips-from-zuckerbergs-facebook-bonanza-1.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.taxlawchannel.com/robert-wood-commentary/2012/3/16/top-tax-tips-from-zuckerbergs-facebook-bonanza-1.html"/><author><name>The Tax Law Channel</name></author><published>2012-03-16T22:09:42Z</published><updated>2012-03-16T22:09:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/38186761?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="480" height="270" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p>The revelation that <a title="More articles about Facebook." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/facebook_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff; text-decoration: underline;">Facebook&rsquo;s</span></a> <a title="More articles about Mark E. Zuckerberg." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/z/mark_e_zuckerberg/index.html?inline=nyt-per" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff; text-decoration: underline;">Mark Zuckerberg</span></a> plans to exercise $5 billion worth of stock options before his IPO  suggests his 2012 tax bill could be close to $2 billion! See <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=zuckerberg%20tax%20bill&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CEIQqQIwAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theregister.co.uk%2F2012%2F02%2F04%2Fzuckerberg_tax_bill%2F&amp;ei=LK4tT4eLAZH9iQLyu7ivCg&amp;usg=AFQjCNHn_RDiwMCbpitkl6td6fIwOOqbpw" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Zuckerberg&rsquo;s 2012 personal income&nbsp;tax bill: $1.5B</span></a>. If size matters, that will make Zuckerberg <em><strong>The Incredible Hulk of Taxpayers</strong></em>. After all, the 400 wealthiest filers only averaged $48 million in federal income taxes in 2009.</p>
<p>As for Warren Buffett with his 17% tax rate? A mere piker, he paid  less than $7 million in federal income and payroll taxes in 2010.&nbsp;Surely  a $3 billion after-tax take-home is nothing to complain about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2012/02/05/top-tax-tips-from-zuckerbergs-facebook-bonanza/"><em><strong>Read more at Forbes</strong></em></a></p>
<p><em>Robert W. Wood practices law with <a href="http://www.woodllp.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Wood LLP</span></a>,  in San Francisco.&nbsp; The author of more than 30 books, including Taxation  of Damage Awards &amp; Settlement Payments (4th Ed. 2009 with 2012  Supplement, <a href="http://www.taxinstitute.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Tax Institute</span></a>), he can be reached at <a href="mailto:Wood@WoodLLP.com" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3366ff;">Wood@WoodLLP.com</span></a>.&nbsp;  This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be  relied&nbsp;upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified  professional.</em></p>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry></feed>
